首页> 外文OA文献 >Implementing the global plan to stop TB, 2011-2015 - optimizing allocations and the global fund's contribution: A scenario projections study
【2h】

Implementing the global plan to stop TB, 2011-2015 - optimizing allocations and the global fund's contribution: A scenario projections study

机译:实施2011-2015年全球结核病控制计划-优化分配和全球基金的贡献:情景预测研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

textabstractBackground: The Global Plan to Stop TB estimates funding required in low- and middle-income countries to achieve TB control targets set by the Stop TB Partnership within the context of the Millennium Development Goals. We estimate the contribution and impact of Global Fund investments under various scenarios of allocations across interventions and regions. Methodology/Principal Findings: Using Global Plan assumptions on expected cases and mortality, we estimate treatment costs and mortality impact for diagnosis and treatment for drug-sensitive and multidrug-resistant TB (MDR-TB), including antiretroviral treatment (ART) during DOTS for HIV-co-infected patients, for four country groups, overall and for the Global Fund investments. In 2015, China and India account for 24% of funding need, Eastern Europe and Central Asia (EECA) for 33%, sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) for 20%, and other low- and middle-income countries for 24%. Scale-up of MDR-TB treatment, especially in EECA, drives an increasing global TB funding need - an essential investment to contain the mortality burden associated with MDR-TB and future disease costs. Funding needs rise fastest in SSA, reflecting increasing coverage need of improved TB/HIV management, which saves most lives per dollar spent in the short term. The Global Fund is expected to finance 8-12% of Global Plan implementation costs annually. Lives saved through Global Fund TB support within the available funding envelope could increase 37% if allocations shifted from current regional demand patterns to a prioritized scale-up of improved TB/HIV treatment and secondly DOTS, both mainly in Africa - with EECA region, which has disproportionately high per-patient costs, funded from alternative resources. Conclusions/Significance: These findings, alongside country funding gaps, domestic funding and implementation capacity and equity considerations, should inform strategies and policies for international donors, national governments and disease control programs to implement a more optimal investment approach focusing on highest-impact populations and interventions.
机译:textabstract背景:《全球控制结核计划》估算了低收入和中等收入国家在实现千年发展目标的背景下实现由“控制结核伙伴关系”设定的结核控制目标所需的资金。我们估计了在各种干预措施和地区的各种分配方案下,全球基金投资的贡献和影响。方法/主要发现:使用全球计划中有关预期病例和死亡率的假设,我们估算在DOTS期间进行抗敏感病毒和耐多药结核病(MDR-TB)的诊断和治疗所需的治疗费用和死亡率影响,其中包括抗逆转录病毒疗法(ART)四个国家/地区的艾滋病毒合并感染患者,以及全球基金的投资。 2015年,中国和印度占资金需求的24%,东欧和中亚(EECA)占33%,撒哈拉以南非洲(SSA)占20%,其他低收入和中等收入国家占24%。扩大耐多药结核病治疗的规模,尤其是在EECA中,推动了全球结核病资金需求的增加-这是一项重要投资,旨在控制与耐多药结核病相关的死亡率负担和未来疾病费用。撒哈拉以南非洲地区的资金需求增长最快,反映出对改善结核病/艾滋病管理的覆盖需求不断增加,这在短期内可节省每美元支出的大部分生命。预计全球基金每年将资助全球计划实施成本的8-12%。如果分配从当前的区域需求模式转移到优先扩大结核病/艾滋病治疗的优先规模,其次是DOTS(主要在非洲)和EECA地区,则在可用资金范围内通过全球基金结核病支持节省的生命可能会增加37%。由替代资源提供资金的人均医疗费用过高。结论/意义:这些发现以及国家资金缺口,国内资金和实施能力以及公平考虑因素,应为国际捐助者,国家政府和疾病控制计划的战略和政策提供参考,以实施针对受影响最大的人口和人口的更优化的投资方法。干预。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号